Posted by dorayme on 04/10/06 02:18

In article <Y8SdnXdILolV16TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:

> David Graham wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I believe you meant, "one of the _other_ guru's".
> >>
> >> Argh! How can you post a correction, but ignore the most obvious error?!
> >>
> > For the not so well informed - what is the obvious error?
> >
> It should be "gurus" not "guru's".
> It's an extension of the "it's" vs "its" controversy.

There is no controversy and it is not an extension of it... er...

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]