Posted by dorayme on 04/17/06 09:09

In article <Xns97A7D12BF5E8httpwwwneredbojiasco@208.49.80.251>,
Neredbojias <http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html>
wrote:

> To further the education of mankind, dorayme
> >
> > Well, if you have some idea about the order of difficulty,
> > perhaps you are justified. I would not know. Your "8 years" is
> > not an argument.
>
> I heartily disagree. Sorry, but the people in question are _supposed to_
> know what they're doing and certainly not take 8 years to do it. How many
> workers do you think could stretch-out their jobs for an 8 year time period
> with false promises and disappointment as a net result?

You heartily disagree with? Lets look at the candidates:

That he is justified if he has a good perspective on the order of
difficulty?

That he is justified even though he has no perspective on the
order of mag of the difficulty of success?

That a statement that any group of people are incompetent, lazy
no-good fools and knaves and schmucks if they can't do something,
no matter what?

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]