Posted by dorayme on 04/18/06 04:38

In article <Xns97A8B0A61B3FFhttpwwwneredbojiasco@208.49.80.251>,
Neredbojias <http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html>
wrote:

> > ie. That he is justified even though he has no perspective on the
> > order of mag of the difficulty of success?
>
> Actually, yes. Let's say the difficulty is extreme, like constructing a
> 300-story hi-rise. Would you exonerate the builders if the structure
> collapsed just because they had faced exceptional problems and not-quite
> handled them?

er... well... er ... Roger:

You obviously can't resist an analogy that suits you. Lives are
at stake there, no building is better than a dangerous one. Are
the wsiwigs available worse than none at all? And it is no use a
hand coding website developer answering this, no more than it
would be any use for a property developer to ask the twin
question in your case.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]