Posted by milahu on 04/21/06 13:08

Tim Martin wrote:
> milahu wrote:
> > IMO, the most odd thing about this is the single "&" between the two
> > statements; I would use "&&" or "and" here. ;)
>
> Why would you do that? '&&' and '&' are completely different operators,
> and give different results when evaluated in boolean context on two numbers.

Because I prefer comparing boolean values with logical instead of byte
operators.

[Back to original message]