Posted by Bruce Grubb on 04/28/06 17:54

In article
<doraymeRidThis-1C4DCF.12234628042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> In article <bgrubb-06AB7A.19421127042006@news.zianet.com>,
> Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <1146129609.907266.281760@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Grubb wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree. Also the web is slowly moving from HTML 4.0.1 to XHTML 1.0
> > > > which
> > > > shoots the whole IE testing idea down.
> > >
> > > Ok, that's pretty clueless. How does HTML / XHTML have an effect on the
> > > relative "usefulness" of IE, which is by and large a question of IE's
> > > broken CSS rendering?
> >
> > Carefull as the last version of IE for the Mac had pretty good CSS
> > rendering. Just because the Windows team programmed with its toes does not
> > mean through throw out the standard.
>
> Please stop! I beg you! You will give Mac users a bad name. You
> are on alt.html and you are supposed to show a bit of interest in
> cross-browser standards.

We are in comp.sys.mac.apps AND alt.html oh wise one. The fact of the
matter is IE for MacOS does NOT have the same bugs as what exists on
WIndows. Heck even the bugs between windows versions are not the same.

[Back to original message]