Posted by Neredbojias on 04/29/06 23:05

To further the education of mankind, "Bill" <no@no.com> vouchsafed:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> vim would fit your requirements quite nicely, Bill.
>
> Actually, I was hopping for something a bit more WYSIWYG. Based on my
> past experience with vim it would be easier to use Notepad.<g>

....Which is better than any WYSIWYG editor out there.

I never could see the fascination with WYSIWYG editors. I do all my html
creation and editing in Notetab Pro. When I make a change, I simply reload
the page in the browser of my choice (-mainly Firefox or SeaMonkey), and
view the results. If I really want to be kewl, I can size the windows so
both fit in the viewport without concealing on another (-but I've never
found that necessary.)

So why use a WYSIWYG editor which _definitely_ has inferior html rendering
capabilities and most likely even inferior text-editing capabilities? -
Just for the "convenience" of an instant response to a markup alteration?
No thanks, I'll do it my way, and my way is really the preferred way
overall, to boot.


--
Neredbojias
Infinity has its limits.

[Back to original message]