Posted by Bruce Grubb on 04/30/06 02:56

In article
<doraymeRidThis-BDFBB2.14055629042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> In article <bgrubb-AA7AAC.17211428042006@news.zianet.com>,
> Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <doraymeRidThis-5BAF83.12141928042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> > dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <bgrubb-C4F42C.19262727042006@news.zianet.com>,
> > > Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Even IE follows most of the 4.0.1 standard. Most of its problems are
> > > > in
> > > > the gee wizardry areas and css. Keeping this to a minimum does
> > > > wonders.
> > >
> > > Ah! So now it comes out. I knew there was something singular
> > > about your attitude from the beginning and here it is in all its
> > > naive glory: you see css as some fancy doodle dandy thing best
> > > left out.
> >
> > No as I use it in my own HTML Tidied pages. I just use it sparingly.
>
> Sparingly? When it is forced on you by a bit of Tidy introducing
> it to tidy up some confusions...

What are you talking about? I tidy up my HTML as a matter of practice and
have been doing that every since I found out about HTML Tidy.

[Back to original message]