Posted by Andy Dingley on 05/03/06 19:04

ironcorona wrote:

> Perhaps you could suggest a better tutorial?

If only I knew of one!

With reservations, I don't dislike it particularly as a tutorial.
However the real "reference" for CSS is simply the real W3C
recommendation. It's not always the most accessible reading, but it's
canonical and it's free.

This is admittedly hard to justify for CSS, as the W3C recommendation
is pretty unreadable. But for the much more easily understandable HTML
or XML recommendatiosn then you should be going "straight to the
source" as soon as you have any need for a "reference" beyond the
hand-holding tutorials.

[Back to original message]