Posted by ironcorona on 05/04/06 09:36

Mark Parnell wrote:
> Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, Spartanicus
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> declared in alt.html:
>> Mark Parnell <webmaster@clarkecomputers.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Not in XHTML. XML has no concept of empty elements.
>> XHTML is merely a reformulation of HTML in XML, what is defined as an
>> empty element in HTML remains an empty element in XHTML.
>
> Ick, did I really say that? What I meant was that XHTML requires all
> elements to be closed, even if they are empty.

So XML *does* have the concept of empty elements?

Actually, I'm off to http://www.doyourowndamnresearch.com
Then I can come back and pretend I knew all along

:)


--
ironcorona

[Back to original message]