Posted by mbstevens on 05/06/06 06:32

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> "Neredbojias" <http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html> skrev i
> meddelandet news:Xns97BAB6FBC30FEhttpwwwneredbojiasco@208.49.80.251...
>
>>To further the education of mankind, Nije Nego <"nije\"nego"@net.hr>
>>vouchsafed:
>>
>>
>>>>Could you please explain to me why it is unsigned?
>>
>>>What is unsigned?
>>
>>Generally means unsigned driver in relation to Win XP. Luigi is right to
>>be cautious because software with unsigned drivers can really screw up XP
>>bad enough to make a reinstall necessary. However, in this case where
>>thousands of people have installed and use the product, on a Mozilla
>>platform as well, his concern is unfounded.
>
>
> It is peculiar that one on the one hand agrees on some standards and on the
> other hand Firefox hosts unsigned drivers...
>
A security risk, either real or perceived, is not the same thing as a
standard.

My Slacking Bob, Luigi, you're having one hell of a night.

[Back to original message]