Posted by Nije Nego on 05/07/06 12:43

On Sat, 6 May 2006 20:12:23 +0100, Jake wrote:

> In message <445cc6a3$0$3700$cb0e7fc6@news.centralva.net>, Jonathan N.
> Little <lws4art@centralva.net> writes
>>Jake wrote:
>>> In message <8e3ti3-rjn.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk>, Toby Inkster
>>><usenet200605@tobyinkster.co.uk> writes
>>>> Jake wrote:
>>>>> David Dorward writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Author's page, but user's browser.
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. Author's page -- so author gets to choose.
>>>>
>>>> User's browser -- so user gets to choose.
>>>>
>>> If you can override the author's design decision, well -- good for you.
>>>
>>>> Should a newspaper publisher be able to choose to make sure all
>>>>readers
>>>> hold the paper in their left hand, hold it a specific distance from their
>>>> face, fold it in a particular way, and so forth? If I've bought a
>>>> newspaper, I'll read it any way I bloody like.
>>> And do you walk into the publisher's office and tell him he can't
>>>produce his newspaper in a certain size, with a specific typestyle,
>>>etc. No? I thought not.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>That is the point you are missing, a webpage is *not* a printed page.
>>
> Nor is a radio or TV broadcast. Your point?

You provided good comparation:

when I change channel on my tv, I want new channel to appear in same
window, if I want having more, I would use Picture in Picture option.

I would hate channels that force themselves.

--
buy, bought, bye

[Back to original message]