Posted by JDS on 05/08/06 02:14

On Sun, 07 May 2006 23:29:43 +0100, Jaxtraw wrote:

> It singularly fails to be
> better than tables.

What? All of what you said is a load of bullshit. Sorry. Not being
defensive, just stating it like it is.

CSS is better for tables, but not necessarily for the reasons you stated.
One can create horrid, bad, unfluid designs using CSS, yes, but CSS is
still better than using tables. And the reason has nothing to do with the
designs themselves. It has to do with the fundamental difference between
what tables were intended to be used for and what CSS was intended to be
used for.

--
JDS | jeffrey@go.away.com
| http://www.newtnotes.com
DJMBS | http://newtnotes.com/doctor-jeff-master-brainsurgeon/

[Back to original message]