Posted by dorayme on 05/09/06 11:11

In article
<1147146871.855219.196440@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
"Chaddy2222" <rockradio2000@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Michael Laplante wrote:
> > "Jim Moe" <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN@sohnen-moe.com> wrote in message
> > news:xaKdnS8GE_Y5BMLZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com...
> > > Michael Laplante wrote:
> >
> > > Accessibility and fluid design are not bound to each other.

Depends what is meant by "bound".

>>> Fixed width designs are as accessible as fluid designs.
> >

Any site chosen at random, would not be more accessible by being
modified to be not so constrained? Doubt it. A person who wanted
the viewport to be utilised more (due, for example, to his
eyesight) might easily find it more easier to use.

> No...... Fluid design = good design!.....

This is just obviously false. It is like saying that a site that
validates must be well designed.

Yes, I know, different folk said these different things...

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]