Posted by Veronica Karlsson on 05/22/06 16:16

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
> >Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> >> ...if they didn't like em, why would my ranking continually increase?
> >> DUM DUM DUM DUM
>
> >Is this "ranking" based on something human, like interviews with users,
> >or some kind of technical measurement, like "hits" or something? IOW,
> >what does it *mean*? (clue: "many hits" != "readers like it")
>
> Look, Veronica, I'm not your babysitter and I'm certainly not your
> instructor. If you don't know how something works, you're just going
> to have to go and try and learn it on your own. Honestly Veronica,
> there's like six and half MILLION hits for "Alexia" in a Google
> search, figure it out, mmmkay?

Your claim is that your ranking increase because of people liking your
site design.

* "Like" is a human thing, not a technical one.
* "Hits" is a technical thing, not a human one.
* Lots of hits does not automatically mean that people
like a site.
* People will put up with a lot of nonsense to get to
interesting content (which I don't doubt that you have,
e.g. I've seen your colourful cookies and that animated
dancing foot).


> >> So what sucks about it?
>
> >Do you think it would be a good idea for me to tell you that? Surely
> >it's enough information to tell you that it does suck?
>
> Hey Peavey, I thought you said Veronica has some actual CRITIQUING in
> this post that I'm apparently "unable" to reply to?
>
> Maybe lil Veronica just got kinda stumbly and confused about my REALLY
> BIG question. Here, I'll try it again...slower this time:
>
> So...what...sucks...about...it?

No, seriously, *why* should I tell you about it? You seem to get upset
when I don't. (There's a clue there...)


> Now, either you HAVE a critique...or you have a witless little
> NONpinion. Or I suppose in your case you have an extraordinary shitty
> backpedal of an "explanation" for your deficiency.
>
> >> >What? You mean, like, communicating with you and tell you *why* it
> >> >sucks? Why should I do that?
>
> >> Well, for starters NOT looking like a bumbling fuckin retard...then
> >> again maybe you're okay with that. *shrugs*
>
> >That doesn't answer my question.
>
> Well, you never answered mine, Kiddo:
>
> So...what...sucks...about...it?

There is something that sucks about it, yes. Do you want me to tell you
what that is? OK, you seem to want that, but *why*?


> >Is there some reason why I should
> >motivate why my opinion is what it is?
>
> The key word here is OPINION...which is in fact not a critique AT ALL.
> I mean, there are some people who have the opinion that the moon
> landings were fake and that wearing tin foil hats will prevent the
> aliens from probing your mind. In other words Veronica, opinions are
> like assholes, everyone's got one. Why you would think yours was more
> important than everyone else's I'm not quite sure. I mean, if you
> don't like my sites...don't visit them. *shrugs* Just a lil free
> cl00 for ya, I didn't make any of my sites for people who don't like
> them, I made them for the people that do. HTH! ^_^

I'm not some random visitor who stumbled in through google or something.
I'm a reader of a discussion group where you put a page on your site up
for discussion.


> >> >> The majority of you pathetic fools couldn't even
> >> >> DREAM of creating a site as advanced as some of the ones I've put
> >> >> together.
>
> >> >1. advanced != good
>
> >> You sounda like...cave man
> >>
> >> You...no lika teh...advancement
> >>
> >> *grunt* *grunt*
> >>
> >> Fire...pretty...but burn stupid caveman
> >>
> >> *grunt*
> >>
> >> Fire...no good
>
> >The fact that your tool is newer does not automatically make the things
> >you build with it better.
>
> It's not that the tool is new, child, it's that the tool itself *IS*
> better and in the hands of someone with enough skill, better things
> can be built.

What makes you think that you have enough skill? AFAICT you lack some
very fundamental skills.


> The bottom line is that with my level of skill and
> ability I can create unique, graphic rich sites with the maximum level
> of portability and usability.

So you think portability and usability is important? And you think that
page of yours has those things? I claim that it doesn't.


> You...well you can't really do much
> outside of HTML v2, can you? It's like I said in a blog entry a few
> days back:
>
> :There's no room to snit about "minimalist" design, if you want plain
> :black text on a white background, write a fuckin RSS feed for your
> :shit, then get over your deficiency and build a REAL
> :website...*snicker*...if you can. `, )

Example of Real Website: http://www.rotten.com/


> >> >2. I have seen no evidence of your page being "advanced".
>
> >> Cupcake, you're so the fuck far outta yer league you wouldn't know
> >> advanced if it suddenly crawled the fuck up yer ass and EXPLODED.
>
> >The page did not look one bit "advanced" to me.
>
> Then let's see you build one like it. I mean, if it's *SO* easy and
> all, let's see you build a straight Flash site with integrated PHP and
> database functionality. Let's see some graphic and animation work
> from you too. I mean, if it's *SO* easy, you should be able to whip
> up a site just like it in just a few minutes, ne?

Why would I want to build a site like yours?


> Oh hey, Veronica...feel stupid...then lie about it. ^_^
>
> >> >You posted the link in a newsgroup. You got comments. Live with it!
>
> >> You got your comments ripped apart and then got all smacked up like a
> >> stupid bitch. Pull up yer wet lil Huggies, dry yer eyes and learn to
> >> fuckin deal already.
>
> >Your page still sucks.
>
> The point isn't so much that you think my "page" sucks, it's WHY you
> think it does...

Yes, that is the point. I'm glad you've figured that out. The question
is, *why* should I tell you? :-)

(And yes, that is *page*, I'm still really only talking about that one
page, not your entire site.)

> and the fact that you're still crying your eyes out in
> yer wet lil Huggies and throwing a tantrum seems to be all the WHY one
> needs to see.
>


--
__ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __
||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \
||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \
|.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \
_\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\
|_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|

[Back to original message]