Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 01/02/44 11:48

dorayme wrote:
> In article <MPG.1ede4359a9671e6398968c@news.centralva.net>,
> Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <slrne78e20.fg1.no.spam@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
>> no.spam@box.invalid says...
>>> dorayme wrote:
>>>> In article <slrne783fj.eto.no.spam@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
>>>> Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:
>> <bickering snipped>
>>
>> And in the corner, the be-antennaed interplanetary champion Martian
>> marvel, *dorayme*....and this corner the salty sultan of the briny deep
>> and advocate for better tooth care, *Blinky the Shark*! Are we ready to
>> rrrrummmmmmble!
>>
>> To the OP, think of an HTML document is not like a Word document where
>> all sorts of media is all bundled up into one neat (but usually humongous
>> package) but more like a script to a play. Your images are actors and the
>> HTML document via links and the markup element directs where the images
>> (actors) stand on stage. That is all. If you want a completely integrated
>> unit like a Word document for online use, try PDF.
>
> What was all this latter para about? What on earth has PDF and
> HTML and Word got to do with our little thread here... o gosh...
> yes... there was an original subject... now it is coming back to
> me... Herr Korpela said something, I said something, Blinky said
> something (really really really daft, then...o no... here we go
> again...
>

Ah yes! The OP, remember another one trying to embed image data into a
web page again... ;-) Just thought your needed to be knocked back on track!

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]