|
|
Posted by dorayme on 05/29/06 02:03
In article <vigpk3-v6n.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk>,
Toby Inkster <usenet200605@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote:
> Chris Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > It can't be that hard to do, and I'd be surprised if someone hadn't had a
> > crack at it.
>
> Using presentation HTML (e.g. FONT elements, table-based layout) and using
> semantic HTML plus CSS are two totally different processes.
>
.....
> to go from presentational HTML to semantic
> HTML means you have to add in some information -- e.g. specify in the
> document which parts are headings, which parts are paragraphs, etc. Adding
> in that information requires human input; which might be why there are no
> tools that can simply transform presentation markup to semantic markup.
>
Yes, well said, Toby. Consider what looks like a problem of
lesser magnitude, for machines to make pictures bigger and be of
equally good quality when you don't have the rich informational
base of a negative. It is well known to be quite hard to enlarge
a digital pic well beyond it's natural size through simple
algorithms. Reducing them in size is quite a different problem
and quite tractable.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|