|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 05/29/06 16:00
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> > Mark Parnell wrote:
> >
> >> Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, "Jonathan N. Little"
> >> <lws4art@centralva.net> declared in alt.html:
> >>
> >>> Word makes horrendous markup only thing worse is MS Publisher!
> >> Ever seen HTML produced by Excel? :-)
> >
> > I've read where the four worst HTML 'editors' are:
> >
> > 4. Microsoft FrontPage
> > 3. Microsoft Word
> > 2. Microsoft Excel
> > 1. Microsoft Publisher
> >
> > Let's give a rousing cheer for the team from Redmond!
> >
> #1 Publisher produces 'markup' (I will quote it because you have never
> seen such code) that barely displays on IE and outright fails on
> anything else. A friend of mine 'hired' one of her friends 'who knows
> computers' to build a personal site for her. She asked me to check it
> out...what could I say!
>
> http://www.redskyibizans.com/
>
> You will not see and image unless use use IE and with Konqueror you
> don't even see any text! I wrote her friend with some tactful
> suggestions, but must have still offended and never received a reply
Yes well, that site did seam to be not very good, however a lot of code
produced by CMS's can be bad as well, http://www.sixdayrace.org.au
What do you think.
--
Regards Chad.
http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|