|
|
Posted by Geoff Berrow on 09/28/74 11:17
I noticed that Message-ID: <m92p9111cv6i67o5p804otquuhiapaqs9j@4ax.com>
from nemo contained the following:
> >It would be better to use alt="" in that case.
>No, it wouldn't. alt="" would produce exactly that when the cursor is over
>the picture "", blank, zero, zilch, nothing, notta sozzidge.
alt text should be used to display any content contained in an image for
the benefit of aural browsers. The idea of having a standard text is a
nonsense. Where the image contains no content (just decoration as in
this case) the correct form is alt="".
> There is no
>point in storing nothing in a database, and even less in storing the same
>thing for each record.
Well no, you wouldn't need to.
--
Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|