|
|
Posted by robert on 05/31/06 01:13
"Martin Jay" <martin@spam-free.org.uk> wrote in message
news:5xfyYzDXiMfEFwWM@spam-free.org.uk...
| In message <Oe1fg.5$im3.0@fe02.lga>, robert <ab@no.spam-alama-ding-dong>
| writes
| >"Martin Jay" <martin@spam-free.org.uk> wrote in message
| >news:k2OFJvKToJfEFwF2@spam-free.org.uk...
| >| In message <ku_eg.6$hu6.3@fe05.lga>, robert
<ab@no.spam-alama-ding-dong>
| >| writes
|
| >| >look in php.net online docs and faq's...this is covered where you can
| >| >specify a max wait time when looking for a response.
|
| >| What is covered in the online "docs and faq's" [sic]?
| >|
| >| Please don't top-post, Robert.
|
| >i didn't top-post
|
| Yes you did, ...
<snip>
i hit reply group...perhaps you need to read the rfc re. non-synchronous
communications in which case there is no guarantee about the arrival time of
any message. i have neither replied out of turn, out of date, or any other
kind of foul muck of which you are acusing.
i also know what sic means...and am fairly certain at seeing how you use it
that you incorrectly use it as "spell it correctly". as i've said before, it
suffices to use quotes when quoting someone or accurately paraphrase...no
sic needed.
now, fuck off and die. when i flame you, it is because you've posted useless
drivel. it seems all you can do is find a stretch of a reason to flame me.
i'll make a mistake sometime. wait for that as an oportunity to rare your
fangs...till then, you only look like a troll...and less than bright.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|