|
|
Posted by robert on 05/31/06 13:07
"Martin Jay" <martin@spam-free.org.uk> wrote in message
news:NKQPmUBp$XfEFwDi@spam-free.org.uk...
| In message <Rd6fg.28$OH7.19@fe07.lga>, robert
| <ab@no.spam-alama-ding-dong> writes
| >| And see: <http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html> Which
| >| includes: "This term is generally used pejoratively with the
implication
| >| that the offending person is a newbie, a Microsoft addict (Microsoft
| >| mail tools produce a similar format by default), or simply a
| >| common-and-garden-variety idiot."
| >|
| >| And your headers confirm this:
| >|
| >| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
| >| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
| >|
|
| >and btw, moe is far better a tool than web based news readers imo. tool
for
| >the job. whatever.
|
| Microsoft Outlook Express isn't the only non web-based newsreader. There
| are lots of others, most of which do a far better job.
and?
| >now all me headers show is that i use moe...again, your failing logic
only
| >shows i use moe. it does NOT confirm the time stamped on the message.
|
| Did I suggest it did? I think you misunderstand what top-posting is.
| Perhaps you should read the pages I posted links to, and do some more
| research at Google if you're still unsure.
uhh...your quoting my headers was justification for the top-posting you
incorrectly accuse me of...yet the headers you show have nothing to do with
supporting that case. so, yes, you did suggest it and, no, it doesn't
support that or anything else.
as with all your other posts to date, you make no sense.
FOAD
*PLONK*
btw, you'll need to wiki plonk.
roflmfao
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|