|
|
Posted by William Hughes on 06/29/38 11:49
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:46:16 GMT, in alt.html "Auggie"
<Imperial.Palace@Rome.It> wrote:
>"William Hughes" <cvproj@grandecom.net> wrote in message
>news:9v68829t6sbcg4j39cugecrn50970c1fov@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:48:56 +1000, in alt.html Mark Parnell
>> <webmaster@clarkecomputers.com.au> wrote:
>> >Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, William Hughes
>> ><cvproj@grandecom.net> declared in alt.html:
>> >
>> >> Hmm... looks like IFRAME is the only semi-reliable option at this
>> >> point.
>> >
>> >Preprocessing is always reliable and always available.
>>
>> True, but there are disk-space limitations to consider...
>
>Unless you are running the site off a 1.44 floppy there isn't.
>
>By preprocessing what he means is all your SSI and server side scripting
>would be compiled and HTML pages would be generated. This doesn't mean that
>image and media files used by the site are duplicated over and over again.
I've been working with HTML for about 7 years. My programming degree
is 16 years old (class of '90).
>HTML is raw ascii text, meaning that 1024 characters is 1KB... If all your
>HTML pages were exactly 80 characters wide you would need 13,000 lines of
>HTML to fill up 1MB
I have a 20mb limit on the personal webspace allocated by Grande. As
it currently stands, my site runs in excess of 300 pages with the
primary included file - the navigation system - taking approximately
15k. 15k x 300 files = 4.5 meg, a not-inconsiderable amount.
--
William Hughes, San Antonio, Texas: cvproj@grandecom.net
The Carrier Project: http://home.grandecom.net/~cvproj/carrier.htm
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|