Posted by Martin Jay on 06/07/06 00:07
In message <C0AC4B5B.6866%junk{@}fishingmonthly.com.au>, moosus
<junk{@}fishingmonthly.com.au> writes
>Just a heads up on this ... What actually works is to reverse your thinking
>- you ban the anonymous users based on updated lists of anonymous proxies
>
>I actually get it done at my firewall - we are a bit rude about it ... If
>users come from any of the anonymous proxies around the world they just
>don't see some of our managed servers - no redirection no nothing
>
>Once an IP drops off the anonymous lists the users can get back in - there
>are many publicly available anonymous proxy lists which you can use to block
>with.
>
>We find that we have greatly reduced the server attack attempts we are
>getting - we also have a manually updated list of rogue IP which we clear on
>a 3 monthly cycle
I was talking to a friend about a similar thing yesterday.
He wasn't able to get a response from <http://www.jinglemad.com/>, but I
could view it without any problems. We both use the same Internet
Provider. The only real difference between our setups is that I use a
dynamically allocated IP address and his is fixed. His trace route
ended with the following:
8 157 ms 153 ms 152 ms 209.51.149.109
9 111 ms 107 ms 105 ms l3-atl-8.gnax.net [209.51.131.18]
10 * * * Request timed out.
The same trace route for me ended with:
7 123 ms 124 ms 123 ms 209.51.149.109
8 110 ms 123 ms 110 ms l3-atl-8.gnax.net [209.51.131.18]
9 124 ms 123 ms 124 ms ice.dnsprotect.com [207.210.68.18]
My 'guess' is that his IP address has found its way onto a block list.
I suggested he tried <http://www.anonymizer.com/> to access the site and
it worked. :)
Apparently he's not been able to visit Jinglemad.com for three weeks
now, and thought it was down. :)
--
Martin Jay
Phone/SMS: +44 7740 191877
Fax: +44 870 915 2124
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|