|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/08/06 02:00
In article <qo93r69fh44l.dlg@markparnell.com.au>,
Mark Parnell <webmaster@clarkecomputers.com.au> wrote:
> Yes, it's certainly very similar. Luigi occasionally makes a little bit
> more sense, but you'd expect that the technology would have improved.
I know what you mean, but if you look at the output of Eliza,
usually it is possible to identify the relevant trigger in the
text of what she is responding to. But not so with Luigi, so
either Luigi is an earlier version of Eliza or a later one which
has code to make it seem not as machine like. Or, to be fair,
Luigi is just your irregular freedom loving European Italian
living in Sweden with a fondness for commercial secrecy, the
Chinese language in particular and ... seagulls.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|