Posted by howachen on 06/12/06 15:53

-Lost 寫道：

> <howachen@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1150007999.978064.267990@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Which one is faster and recommended for running reliable PHP
> > application?
>
> It is more reliable, flexible, and more secure than mod_php. Not to mention a lot of
> hosting companies (well, the smart and secure-minded) are not even supporting mod_php
> anymore.
>
> > Seems FastCGI is faster, but if eA is used, will mod_php outperform
> > fastcgi approach?
>
> Um, what is "eA"?
>
> Yes, PHP-CGI is faster than running as an Apache module.
>
> -Lost

eA means eAccelerator (www.eaccelerator.net), which can boost the
performance of php scripts by caching the compiled scripts and stored
in memory. I don't know if eA or other similar caching solutions are
supported on fast-cgi

• Next in forum: Re: lazy me looking for a freebie simple gallery script
• Prev in forum: Re: lazy me looking for a freebie simple gallery script - way Off Topic by now
• Thread view: Re: FastCGI VS mod_php

[Reply to this message]