|
Posted by J.O. Aho on 06/14/06 18:05
strawberry wrote:
> I'm still not sure that the images bit is flexible enough, but I guess
> it's a start.
It depends on what would be stored there, if it's with full path to the image,
then it may or may not be enough, but if it's just the name of the image (you
can hardcode the path, so you don't need to save that in the table), then many
digital cameras uses 8.3 (12 character in total) as the name for the image, in
this case the 50 would be over kill, but then I don't know what Frankly want
to store.
//Aho
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|