Posted by dorayme on 11/26/84 11:50

In article <XS%kg.5259$E02.1760@newsb.telia.net>,
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:

> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
> news:doraymeRidThis-A10719.08581518062006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > In article <4E%kg.5257$E02.1728@newsb.telia.net>,
> > "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Which one is "strict"?
> >
> > Ask a precise question. Or I won't put in a sweet word for you
> > with Heather...
>
>
> You wrote about the advantages/disadvantages
> of using one of the following alternatives
> <a name="..">description</a>
> or <a id="..">description</a>
> so I asked
> whether the former or the latter complies with the requirements to validate
> as HTML 4.01 strict.
> Or are they both accepted?

Both. (I will now put in a good word for you with Heather who is
a very close gossip friend of mine).

--
dorayme

• Next in forum: Re: simple html question about anchors
• Prev in forum: Re: href="javascript:func()" vs href="#" onclick="javascript:func()"
• Thread view: Re: quick syntax question

[Reply to this message]