Posted by Jukka K. Korpela on 06/19/06 05:15

Neredbojias <http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html> scripsit:

> Well, javascript:void is a core javascript construct,

Really? I thought core javascript was ECMAScript.

> Perhaps there is no _specific_ _html_
> spec citing "javascript:void" verbatim, but I hardly consider that a
> good reason to avoid it's usage.

By HTML specifications, the content of an href attribute is a URL (or a
URI), so a specification of the javascript: _URL_ would be needed. This
would not be part of HTML _or_ JavaScript but a separate specification;
normally URL specifications are published as RFCs. It would of course
specify it as a pseudo-URL, which is a URL syntactically only. Anyway, there
is no such specification.

> There is much documentation written
> regarding this usage which certainly seems acceptable and valid by
> all parties concerned.

Browser vendors' documents are not specifications.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

• Next in forum: The natural space between inline list items?
• Prev in forum: Re: Determining the font characteristics of any web page?
• Thread view: Re: href="javascript:func()" vs href="#" onclick="javascript:func()"

[Reply to this message]