Posted by Adrienne Boswell on 06/20/06 14:25

Gazing into my crystal ball I observed Neredbojias
<http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html> writing in
news:Xns97E8E0661143httpwwwneredbojiasco@208.49.80.251:

> The warning is completely bogus.
>
> Suppose I have an image I want 8px from container left but margined
> right at 1% of container width? The markup is:
>
><img style="margin:0 1% 0 8px" src="da.gif" alt="">
>
> How does that make the page or ss "non-robust"? I think the w3c is a
> little too full of itself, or a little too full of something.
>
>

It doesn't say it's wrong, it's a warning that it might break. IIRC,
when tables were used for layout, it was an issue then, too, not mixing
percentages and fixed sizes.

--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share

• Next in forum: Re: Pages that work at different resolutions
• Prev in forum: Re: Throttling software to show how long a page takes to load on a slower connection?
• Thread view: Re: Robust CSS

[Reply to this message]