|
|
Posted by Juliette on 06/21/06 18:41
Andy Jeffries wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:17:25 +0200, Juliette wrote:
>> The regex will still win, but I would guess this is slightly faster than
>> my earlier function.
>
> Indeed it is, this function runs in 0.4208 seconds making it the second
> fasted non-regex function.
>
Cool ! ;-)
I've looked at Andy's to see what he does and bleeping heck, that's a
hard one to get my head round, but I can see why that would be faster.
Changing my function to a while loop would probably take yet some more
of the timing, but I haven't really got the time to do so now.
Regex wins the show.
Grz, Juliette
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|