|
|
Posted by Ed Mullen on 06/23/06 20:07
PeterMcC wrote:
> dorayme wrote in
> <doraymeRidThis-D7795A.09001023062006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>
>
>> In article <449a6f8e$0$944$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>,
>> "PeterMcC" <peter@mccourt.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I know - I assumed that Luigi (There is a Luigi, isn't there? It's
>>> not just you up to mischief?) meant "had an understanding of" rather
>>> than actually spoke.
>> No he did not mean this, he meant what he said. If you had read
>> what I had said about my own important and informative experience
>> you would see what the situation was. And, no I did not create
>> the Luigi website, how absolutely dare you? I have made an
>> appointment with my lawyers for later this morning to see how I
>> might sue you, can you please supply full name and address for
>> the orders to be served. In the court case, it will emerge that I
>> do have an uncanny sympathy and understanding of Luigi but that I
>> am obviously quite a distinct being to him. He will have a tie on
>> and he will be framed by a border in a lurid "#0FFFFF"
>
> 1 - That seagull will never stand up in court.
>
> 2 - The prospect of being the first earthling to be sued by a Martian is
> quite attractive but,
>
> 3 - there's a strong chance of further teeing off everyone here so,
>
> 4 - I concede, unconditionally.
>
> What is Latin, anyway?
>
Latin is a very easily understood language if one has the key. For
instance:
O Civili, Si Ergo. Fortibus Es In Ero. O Novili, Doser Nobus, Doser
Trux. Vadis Inem? Causen Dux.
See the bottom of the page: http://mozilla.edmullen.net/moz_html.html
for the translation.
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
When in doubt assume that, once again, you've outsmarted yourself.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|