|
|
Posted by Chris Tomlinson on 07/06/06 18:35
"Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@physics.gla.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.64.0607061850490.9120@ppepc20.ph.gla.ac.uk...
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
>
>> You must be one of the 0.01% who have disabled JavaScript for some
>> reason. That sort of statistic is obviously not too worrying for us,
> If you make up your own numbers, it's no surprise that they don't
> worry you.
>
> More realistic estimates seem to come up with figures like 10-15% and
> rising (for sites that a reader has no particular reason to trust).
For every site I have run, the JS-disabled statistics of visitors have never
gone above 1%. Others also share this experience. On one site I kept
getting hits from someone without JS and it started to worry me when it
reached 1%... until I realised it was my own test hits!
> Then there's the search engine issue, though you might not be
> concerned about that in the present context.
Can you elaborate on which issue you mean? Cheers.
--
Thanks,
Me
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|