|
|
Posted by joboils on 07/07/06 08:27
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 09:30:57 +0200, Vincent van Beveren
<vvanbeveren@xiam.nl> wrote:
>You could maybe use the NOSCRIPT tag for that?
>
><NOSCRIPT>
> .. plain and simple HTML with maps ...
></NOSCRIPT>
><SCRIPT>
> .. dynamic loading of images ...
></SCRIPT>
>
>Most WYSIWYG editors read the NOSCRIPT and skip the SCRIPT tags. Most
>browsers skip the NOSCRIPT and execute the SCRIPT in the script tags.
>
>
>Chris Tomlinson wrote:
>> PS: Oh dear, we just realised that if we put the images into JS as per your
>> demo page, they probably won't appear in WYSIWYG view in web page editors,
>> correct? Unfortunately these are essential tools due to the imagemaps we
>> need to draw around all the doors and shop signs, so the JPGs must be
>> visible in programs such as FrontPage, Dreamweaver, etc. Do you have any
>> other ideas to control the loading of slices?
>>
>>
The more experienced may well "have at" the following, but -
if you are downloading the entire image in a one-er, and if people are
going to have to scroll *anyway*, why not put the downloaded image in
a <table width="10000" (or whatever size)> ?
(BTW, I didn't like the thick, kiddie-appearance of the borders.)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|