|
|
Posted by Vincent van Beveren on 07/07/06 11:45
You'd create the images map just in the NOSCRIPT and write a SCRIPT to
copy the content (atleast the images, including image map references) of
the NOSCRIPT. So you just need one set. The advantage of this method is
also that users without JavaScript see the images. You might also
consider using the lowsrc attribute for images
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/lowsrc.asp),
though I have the idea FF doesn't listen to it.
Vincent
Chris Tomlinson wrote:
> "Vincent van Beveren" <vvanbeveren@xiam.nl> wrote in message
> news:44ae0da8$0$29589$9a622dc7@news.kpnplanet.nl...
>> You could maybe use the NOSCRIPT tag for that?
>>
>> <NOSCRIPT>
>> .. plain and simple HTML with maps ...
>> </NOSCRIPT>
>> <SCRIPT>
>> .. dynamic loading of images ...
>> </SCRIPT>
>>
>> Most WYSIWYG editors read the NOSCRIPT and skip the SCRIPT tags. Most
>> browsers skip the NOSCRIPT and execute the SCRIPT in the script tags.
>
> Good idea, thanks Vincent :)
>
> Would the <script> sections read the imagemaps in the <noscript> sections,
> or would we need to create 2 sets of imagemaps, and put one of them in the
> dynamic loading part?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|