|
|
Posted by Chris Tomlinson on 07/07/06 14:14
Thanks Vincent, we're going to look into this method. Really appreciate
your support and ideas.
--
Thanks,
Me
"Vincent van Beveren" <vvanbeveren@xiam.nl> wrote in message
news:44ae4950$0$32735$9a622dc7@news.kpnplanet.nl...
> You'd create the images map just in the NOSCRIPT and write a SCRIPT to
> copy the content (atleast the images, including image map references) of
> the NOSCRIPT. So you just need one set. The advantage of this method is
> also that users without JavaScript see the images. You might also consider
> using the lowsrc attribute for images
> (http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/lowsrc.asp),
> though I have the idea FF doesn't listen to it.
>
> Vincent
>
> Chris Tomlinson wrote:
>> "Vincent van Beveren" <vvanbeveren@xiam.nl> wrote in message
>> news:44ae0da8$0$29589$9a622dc7@news.kpnplanet.nl...
>>> You could maybe use the NOSCRIPT tag for that?
>>>
>>> <NOSCRIPT>
>>> .. plain and simple HTML with maps ...
>>> </NOSCRIPT>
>>> <SCRIPT>
>>> .. dynamic loading of images ...
>>> </SCRIPT>
>>>
>>> Most WYSIWYG editors read the NOSCRIPT and skip the SCRIPT tags. Most
>>> browsers skip the NOSCRIPT and execute the SCRIPT in the script tags.
>>
>> Good idea, thanks Vincent :)
>>
>> Would the <script> sections read the imagemaps in the <noscript>
>> sections, or would we need to create 2 sets of imagemaps, and put one of
>> them in the dynamic loading part?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|