|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 07/15/06 12:08
To further the education of mankind, "Jonathan N. Little"
<lws4art@centralva.net> vouchsafed:
>>> I'm one of these pesky little dudes who has javascript turned of
>>> most of the time, with IMO good reason.
>>
>> Uh, me, too. Dimwits have abused javascript in the past and continue
>> to do so to a lesser extent today. Nevertheless, the doesn't make
>> javascript any less viable a styling method.
>
> Yes and companies that artificially extended JavaScript beyond its
> sandbox to save a buck on tech support and software upgrades and pack
> is
> into a OS tools that masquerades as a web browser facilitating such
> abuse....
No comments on Active-X? That's the real pisser.
> JavaScript can be a very useful component to a webpage, HTML for
> structure of content, CSS for presentation, JavaScript for user
> interaction and events, server-side (Perl, PHP, ASP...) for dynamic
> content... I'd like to be put back in its box, and if you want to do
> some system stuff over a network, then require some app be installed
> and stop doing through my web browser...
I don't think I have any argument over all that. A browser belongs under
its user's control. I don't like having some idiot doing wierd things via
my interface, either. However, I do like using j/s to enhance the styling
and functionality of a page in a constructive way, and that's what I do.
--
Neredbojias
Infinity has its limits.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|