Posted by Colin on 09/27/24 11:53

What can html 4.01 do that xhtml can't?

As the spec [link: ] says, "[XHTML is ]a reformulation of HTML 4 as an
XML 1.0 application"

If i had to pick one to go with, i'd chose XHTML (Transitional,
personally, at this time...)

I'd rather be working with the better technology and have to deal with
'the browser issue' than push HTML 4.01 to the bitter end of its
usefulness/abilities.

C

Geoff Berrow wrote:
> Message-ID: <1153326410.946395.313070@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> from
> cwdjrxyz contained the following:
>
> >If I were teaching a programming course, I
> >would require that all programs be written in xhtml 1.1 as well as html
> >4.01 strict
>
> Why both? They are two separate things used for different reasons.
>
> --
> Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
> It's only Usenet, no one dies.
> My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
> Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

• Next in forum: Re: serving xhtml with php
• Prev in forum: Re: $HTTP_REFERER crashes my system like clockwork
• Thread view: Re: serving xhtml with php

[Reply to this message]