|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 06/07/05 04:26
"Wrm" <nomailstodragon@north.invalid> skrev i meddelandet
news:d82stu$s3r$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
>
> "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote in message
> news:sY5pe.139693$dP1.490560@newsc.telia.net...
>
> <snip>
>
> > If it does not really have any disadvantage I have nothing against to
use
> > it.
> > But may-be it is better to wait for other opinions.
> > May-be there are other people in this NG who know of possible
> disadvantages.
>
> I'd be VERY surprised if there are any disadvantages from using include().
>
> <snip>
> > 1) I still want to have both the html and the php version.
>
> There is no point having both.
There is and
Besides, have you considered that you might
> trigger Google (or other searchengines) duplicate filters and get
penalties
> for your page SERPs with same contents on .php and .html ?
>
>
> <snip>
>
> > What about the site map?
> > I want to build one. It can help both users and robots.
> > Would you rather build one as an image, as a html document or a php
> > document?
>
> I'd have site driven from database and php automatically building sitemap
> from data.
>
>
> > Would you use CSS for the layout?
>
> Yes.
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|