|
|
Posted by Alan J. Flavell on 07/24/06 15:04
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, jojo wrote:
> I suppose most people here are glad, that Andrew didn't use a table.
> The reason: tables are not a layout object, they are for displaying
> tabular data.
Quite so, and a verse and its translation certainly stand in a
relationship which is apt to be presented as tabular data.
> In HTML 4.01 you shouldn't use any element for different purpose
> than it's semantic meaning. For layout use CSS.
And in English you shouldn't confuse its with it's
> > That way, the columns would take their natural widths in most
> > situations. To make things work in very narrow windows as well,
> > you could use a little CSS so that if a table cell's content is
> > divided into two lines, it appears with some indentation on the
> > second (and any subsequent) line, to indicate continuation of a
> > verse.
Why did you quote that, if you had nothing to say about it?
....herrschaftszeiten...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|