|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 07/29/06 16:37
"David Dorward" <dorward@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:eag219$1v3$1$830fa7b3@news.demon.co.uk...
> Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>
> >> > The fact the most webpages do not style them differently does not
mean
> >> > that it had been better not to do that either...
>
> >> No, but it gives a strong hint that that is the case.
>
> > Most webpages probably do not validate either....
>
> How about limiting the selection to "webpages which are in other regards
of
> high quality"?
That sounds more interesting in this context.
> >> > if styling them differently had been a bad example why did W3 show
just
> >> > that, then?
>
> >> They don't. They give them ids. That is not the same as styling them.
>
> > I see your point.
>
> >> An id /can/ be used for styling ... but it can also be used for a lot
of
> >> other things too (as I mentioned previously).
>
> > Would it not be better to link to an id which is contained in the
heading
> > as I did myself?
>
> Is a link to a heading really better then a link to a section of the
> document which that heading is for (and said section includes the heading
> itself)
The heading should indicate the main topic of the section of the document,
the document itself contains both
the main topic and other details.....is a link not usually connected to the
main idea of that section?
What would you do if you want to hightlight in the
> > Or does it not play any role perhaps?
>
> As I mentioned before, it could also be used with DOM either on the server
> or the client (e.g. a script to show and hide sections, or highlight them,
> or etc).
Can you also speak "Svenska"?
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia.html
Hur kallar man Sverige på italienska?
E l´Italia in svedese?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|