|
Posted by William Tasso on 08/03/06 23:28
Fleeing from the madness of the No thank you jungle
Charles Sweeney <me@charlessweeney.com> stumbled into
news:alt.html,alt.www.webmaster
and said:
> dorayme wrote
>
>> In article <MrQ98131121791B6itsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>,
>> »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>> Does clicking the page not work in your browser?
>>
>> Define "work"
>
> Then pass it to the Inland Revenue.
Talking of the (spit) Inland (spit) Revenue ... there's serious debate (in
th UK) about parking 'fines' being in reality a revenue stream - a regular
'hot topic' to use the modern idiom.
I'm sure we all put them down as expenses on our returns only for the
accountant to credit them out because fines cannot be tax deductable -
however were it to be successfully argued that these costs are a useful
revenue stream (for the recipient) then we have grounds to insist they are
seen as such on our tax returns.
Note: I hate the f*cking idiotic games one has to play when dealing with
these clowns.
--
William Tasso
http://williamtasso.com/words/what-is-usenet.asp
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|