|
|
Posted by mbstevens on 08/04/06 15:16
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:09:00 +0100, David Dorward wrote:
> mbstevens wrote:
>> alt="logo" />
>
> "logo" is pretty poor alt text. It should be a replacement for an image, not
> a brief description of it (sometimes a brief description is a good
> replacement, but not usually).
>
> Remember, if images are turned off, this is the same as:
>
> <a href="someOther.html">logo</a>
>
> Does that make sense?
Certainly does, but in the absence of more information about
what his business or lack thereof is, 'logo' was about the best
I could come up with.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|