|
|
Posted by dorayme on 08/05/06 01:22
In article <pan.2006.08.04.15.15.19.1808@XmbstevensX.com>,
mbstevens <NOXwebmasterX@XmbstevensX.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:09:00 +0100, David Dorward wrote:
>
> > mbstevens wrote:
> >> alt="logo" />
> >
> > "logo" is pretty poor alt text. It should be a replacement for an image, not
> > a brief description of it (sometimes a brief description is a good
> > replacement, but not usually).
> >
> > Remember, if images are turned off, this is the same as:
> >
> > <a href="someOther.html">logo</a>
> >
> > Does that make sense?
>
> Certainly does, but in the absence of more information about
> what his business or lack thereof is, 'logo' was about the best
> I could come up with.
You took the words out of my mouth...
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|