|
|
Posted by Bjψrn Augestad on 08/08/06 13:48
Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
> "boa" <boasema@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mq-dnQaIHbQLBUrZ4p2dnA@telenor.com...
>
>>While we're at it, any thoughts on the registry setting
>>NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate?
>>
>
>
> None other than you're probably over thinking the problem.
>
> Seriously, any performance gains, etc. you're almost certainly better off
> looknig elsewhere.
>
Sorry if I've given you the impression that we're not looking elsewhere.
Right now we are 5 guys rewriting queries and client applications, as
well as adding memory, servers, more spindles and everything else that
may improve performance, and the profiler and dta runs 24/7(Almost...).
Maybe it's just me, but I enjoy knowing these things, and if MSFT added
NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate(aka unix noatime) I presume they did it for
a reason. It would be nice to know that reason ;-)
BjΓΈrn
>
>
>>BjΓΈrn
>>
>>[snip]
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|