|
|
Posted by Chris F.A. Johnson on 08/09/06 20:13
On 2006-08-09, Nije Nego wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 00:47:52 -0400, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 2006-08-06, Chaddy2222 wrote:
>>>
>>> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>>>> On 2006-08-04, spiffy wrote:
>>>> > If anyone is interested, I wrote a design diagram from design to the
>>>> > page for a friend of mine.
>>>> >
>>>> > http://xnot.org/public/articles/2006/07/06/css-from-the-ground
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't trust any article that recommends:
>>>>
>>>> #header {
>>>> width: 800px;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Or <div> when you should use <Hx>:
>>>>
>>>> <div id="header">xnot.org</div>
>>>
>>> Yes, I tend to agree. Useing PX for width can be a mess, especially
>>> when viewing pages with a high screan resolution.
>>> I actually use both for the header though, I use a Div Header tag, but
>>> I have a <h1> tag inside that tag, it means I can give some more layout
>>> to the header, although, I guess you could just give those same layout
>>> instructions to the <h1> tags.
>>
>> When there is more to the header than just the title text (which
>> should be <h1>), it makes sense to wrap it in <div id="header"></div>.
>
> I find class, tag, ID and span enough to do pretty much anything with <hx>.
If you use class, tag, ID and span without h1, you are not creating
a well-structured document.
If you use any of them with the only an h1 element inside, they are
unnecessary.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|