|
|
Posted by Hadron Quark on 08/10/06 20:54
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:14:12 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:26:22 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/07/1824250&from=rss
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| With the redesign of my own site last month, I discovered just
>>>| how non-compliant IE is with basic CSS: IE 52% vs. Firefox 93%. Is
>>>| Microsoft purely incompetent and tone-deaf to customers -- or simply
>>>| counting on IE's non-compliance remaining a de-facto standard?"
>>> `----
>>>
>>> Points to: http://www.idealog.us/2006/08/microsoft_drops.html
>>
>> Dude, that's over a year old.
>>
>> What's more. Why doesn't his site look ok in IE? Maybe he should consider
>> creating valid XHTML and CSS.
>>
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newscloud.com
>>
>> Ironic that a guy that bitches aobut standards conformance can't be
>> bothered to conform to standards.
>
> By the way, see Chris Wilson's response (Chris is the lead program manager
> of IE)
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/cwilso/archive/2006/08/10/694584.aspx
Always nice when you see a reasoned contribution from someone actually
involved in a products development.
--
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|