Posted by GreyCloud on 08/11/06 23:04

Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:06:01 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>
>>In message <1olrpj6dtxkrv.dlg@funkenbusch.com>, Erik Funkenbusch
>><erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> writes
>>
>>
>>>see Chris Wilson's response (Chris is the lead program manager of IE)
>>>
>>>http://blogs.msdn.com/cwilso/archive/2006/08/10/694584.aspx
>>
>>
>>Failed validation, 67 errors
>>
>>http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.msdn.com%2Fcwilso%2Farchive%2F2006%2F08%2F10%2F694584.aspx
>>
>>(aka http://tinyurl.com/odw6o )
>
>
> As I responded in a different thread, this is because of a flaw in the
> W3C's parser that cannot handle XHTML style tags in an HTML 4 document
> (which is legal).

Aren't HTML and XHTML different?


--
Where are we going?
And why am I in this handbasket?

• Next in forum: Re: Bug at Opera?
• Prev in forum: Re: Make money by doing nothing!
• Thread view: Re: [News] Internet Explorer 7 Still Against Web Standards

[Reply to this message]