Posted by Erland Sommarskog on 08/11/06 22:07

Jim Devenish (internet.shopping@foobox.com) writes:
> I am having some problems in the process of moving an Access back-end
> to an SQL Server back-end. Everything works but there are severe
> problems of response times when the number of users builds up.
>
> At present we are using the Developer version before committing to the
> Enterprise version. BOL (quoted below) seems to suggest that, apart
> from licensing, they are the same.
>
> Can anyone please confirm that this is so. If not, what is the
> difference?

The difference is exactly in the license. And when you mention users
building up, I get a little vervous that you are violating it...



--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx

• Next in forum: Re: SQL Server 200 Developer vs Enterprise versions
• Prev in forum: Re: Error in Creating table in Sql server 2000
• Thread view: Re: SQL Server 200 Developer vs Enterprise versions

[Reply to this message]