|
|
Posted by Paul Watt on 08/16/06 15:14
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
news:6a523$44e32dfe$40cba7b2$16464@NAXS.COM...
> Paul Watt wrote:
>> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
>
>>> I too wish folks would use a word processor with extended spelling and
>>> grammar check to develop the 'copy' for their sites. And as with printed
>>> versions you would not use the word processor to directly layout a book
>>> one should not use it to layout a webpage. The clipboard is your friend!
>>> A simple text editor or better one with syntax highlighting (I like
>>> CrimsonEditor) coupled with a template that you can make can be a very
>>> efficient process. Basic HTML is not rocket-science!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm not talking about the copy, I'm talking about the HTML
>>
>
> We may be saying the same thing, I would only recommend the word processor
> for the development of the 'copy' and not the 'markup'. The markup (HTML)
> is not very complicated on the whole, especially if one restricts it to
> the semantic structure and styles with CSS. The text editor is what I
> recommend for the markup. I have not been impressed by any conversion
> filter or WYSIWYG editor, some a notably better than others but IMO not
> nearly as good as by hand.
>
Agreed. We could of been going around in circles for hours! :)
P.S. I don't know if you know but some of the links on your site are dead. I
was having a nose around on some of your links to "sites designed" and there
was some dead 'uns.
--
Cheers
Paul
le singe est dans l'arbre
http://www.paulwatt.info
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|