|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 08/21/06 19:13
"Rik" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:62482$44e967d3$8259c69c$23728@news2.tudelft.nl...
> rf wrote:
> > "Rik" wrote:
> >> Greg N. wrote:
> >
> >>> But it is not surprising that these eytracking studies show little
> >>> attention to the right hand side of web pages, because most web
> >>> pages don't have much there to look at. To conclude that right
> >>> hand menus would be inferior is daring.
> >>
> >> Not really inferior, not at all actually. However, since people are
> >> 'trained' to scan in an F-like pattern, and the internet public is
> >> very fast in leaving a site, you could well lose some visitors who
> >> cannot spot you navigation in a split second. Ergonomically there is
> >> nothing wrong with
> >> it.
> >
> > Perhaps actually superior. If the *content* is on the left then you
> > grab your audience straight away. This of course assumes that the
> > relevant content *is* on the front page.
> >
> > What is more eye catching, some jucy information or a bunch of links
> > to elsewhere in the site?
>
> Well, you've got a point. It depends on the sight I suppose, wether people
> normally come in on the frontpage, wether they mean to read the whole
site,
> or just some singe page that got returned by a search. There is no
> definitive answer I think.
I agree. Is it true that
Google pays to place advertisements on websites?
How much do they pay?
How does that work?
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia.html
你想去 度假马?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|