|  | Posted by Animesh Kumar on 06/09/05 23:05 
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
 > "Els" <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> skrev i meddelandet
 > news:4hppn9bnp7s0.e2r47my6krv5.dlg@40tude.net...
 >
 >>Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
 >>
 >>
 >>>"Toby Inkster" <usenet200504@tobyinkster.co.uk> skrev i meddelandet
 >>>news:pan.2005.06.09.07.06.31.271389@tobyinkster.co.uk...
 >>>
 >>>>Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>>My next question is about how to style css. I have seen that there
 >>>>>are some site maps with nice geometrical forms but I do not know
 >>>>>how I could group several items in a circle or in a ellipse.
 >>>>
 >>>>http://tobyinkster.co.uk/more-complex-spiral
 >>>
 >>>That already sounds an interesting suggestion. But I was wondering
 >>>whether I could position the lists of links in this form without
 >>>showing the spiral or the circle or the ellipse themselves. If I
 >>>used a circle for example, the homepage could be at the centre of
 >>>the page.
 >>
 >>Would you use text or images for the links?
 >>A sitemap is typically a page with a lot of links, and I wonder how
 >>crowded it would look with texts in circles.
 >
 >
 >
 > I do not know yet so I was wondering about both solutions.
 >
 >
 >>Here is an example of a functional circle of images, which makes
 >>perfect sense to have it in a circle instead of in lists (imho).
 >>
 >>http://pcbuilder.alternate.nl/html/builderStart.html
 >
 >
 >
 > It sounds nice.
 >
 > \
 
 Behold! The page uses frames. Use of frames is often questioned. Plus,
 that page has an "icon" for every link (in the form of a computer part).
 Someone who is lost in your site will not relate to icons easily.
 (Unless you create some nice pictorial icons)
 
 >>On this page it's important that one can see at once which components
 >>have been 'installed' yet, which makes the circular form very useful.
 >>
 >>On your site however, I think the amount of links will obscure the
 >>overview, plus I don't think your pages can be as clearly depicted as
 >>computer parts.
 >
 >
 > My site has already a structure and
 >  it could suit a multi-tiered sitemap where the main part has a similar form
 > as the one which you described.
 >
 >
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |